On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Chris Dent <chd...@redhat.com> wrote:
> People seem to talk about this flexibility as if it were a good > thing. It's not. There's tyranny of choice all over OpenStack. Is > that good for real people or just large players and our corporate > hosts? +++++++++++++ We have a history of trying to be all things to all people, and our structure makes saying no hard and unpopular. It appears as though competitors with checkbooks are saying no to each other, not that technical leaders are saying yes to good projects and implementations that have technical merit. I believe that part of the all-things model is due to our Corporate structure which has the notion that they all have to differentiate their cloud from the others. For more on how that is working out see DefCore, et al. At the technical level we like to say we are beyond that, and I believe that many really are. But many is not all and the results are clearly not acceptable because where we are having this conversation... dt -- Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
