Hi all I just wanted to make sure we are all under the same understanding of the outcomes and what the next steps for the versioned objects session are.
1. There is a lot of interest in other projects using oslo versioned objects and it is worth progressing with this ( https://review.openstack.org/#/c/127532). 2. jpipes and jharlow suggested experimenting/investigating google protocol buffers (https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/) instead of the custom serialization and version code. This *could* be an implementation detail, but also could make the adoption by nova more complicated (as it has a different mechanism in place). 3. vish brought up one draw back of versioned objects: the difficulty in cherry picking commits for stable branches - Is this a show stopper?. Next steps: - Jay suggested making a second spec that would lay out what it would look like if we used google protocol buffers. - Dan: do you need some help in making this happen, do we need some volunteers? - Are there any other concrete things we can do to get this usable by other projects in a timely manner? Regards Angus
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
