On Nov 24, 2014, at 13:06, Jay Pipes <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote: > That said, I don't think it's wise to make oslo-versionedobjects be a totally > new thing. I think we should use nova.objects as the base of a new > oslo-versionedobjects library, and we should evolve oslo-versionedobjects > slowly over time, eventually allowing for nova, ironic, and whomever else is > currently using nova/objects, to align with an Oslo library vision for this. > > So, in short, I also think a) is the appropriate path to take.
+1 I'd like to see oslo-versionedobjects start out with nova.objects as the implementation, with the ability to add support for protobuf later. melanie (melwitt)
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStackemail@example.com http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev