On Nov 24, 2014, at 13:06, Jay Pipes <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> That said, I don't think it's wise to make oslo-versionedobjects be a totally 
> new thing. I think we should use nova.objects as the base of a new 
> oslo-versionedobjects library, and we should evolve oslo-versionedobjects 
> slowly over time, eventually allowing for nova, ironic, and whomever else is 
> currently using nova/objects, to align with an Oslo library vision for this.
> So, in short, I also think a) is the appropriate path to take.

+1 I'd like to see oslo-versionedobjects start out with nova.objects as the 
implementation, with the ability to add support for protobuf later.

melanie (melwitt)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

OpenStack-dev mailing list

Reply via email to