On 12/11/14 04:17, Clint Byrum wrote: > Just as a counter-point: The entire reason that a mid-cycle is an > important thing to do is to achieve higher bandwidth communication between > contributors. We can do Hangouts all the time and that's certainly a > useful thing. But making the people in the room who have high bandwidth > slow down for those who are at the other end of low-bandwidth may not be > a productive thing as a whole. > > Anyway, just a thought as somebody who has tried this before.
I understand but I am definitely not saying the room should slow down for someone on hangout - heck I'd be ecstatic if microphones are even used). In my experience this can work best if it is understood that remotees have a read-only feed into the room audio (best case + video of slides) - it makes the world of difference compared to say just staring at the etherpad being updated. I don't see this as having a high cost to setup (just point a laptop at the speaker, end), If you are a remotee and need read/write into the meeeting then you should prepare beforehand and have stuff written down to share. It is only common courtesy, and I absolutely agree it would be in the very least inconsiderate to expect the room to stop/slow down to allow any kind of conversation to happen over hangout. In fact, just click the on-air button and that way you get a youtube link to share, which obviously *is* read-only (r/w participation is limited @ 10 afaik), my 2c, thanks, marios > > Excerpts from Marios Andreou's message of 2014-11-11 08:56:05 -0800: >> +1 would be great to at least have a hangout going >> >> >> >> _sent from my mobile device, sorry for spacing/spelling/top-posting/.*_ >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Kyle Mestery [mest...@mestery.com] >> Received: Tuesday, 11 Nov 2014, 16:14 >> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> [email@example.com] >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Neutron mid-cycle announcement >> >> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Gary Kotton <gkot...@vmware.com> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> For those unable to attend will there be an option of remote access? >>> Thanks >>> Gary >>> >> We'll do our best to make this happen. I'll see if we can get a Google >> Hangout going in the room, and make sure people are on IRC. >> >> Thanks! >> Kyle >> >>> On 11/11/14, 3:04 PM, "Kyle Mestery" <mest...@mestery.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi folks: >>>> >>>> Apologies for the delay in announcing the Neutron mid-cycle, but I was >>>> confirming the details up until last night. I've captured the details >>>> on an etherpad here . The dates are December 8-10 >>>> (Monday-Wednesday), and it will be at the Adobe offices in Lehi, Utah, >>>> USA. >>>> >>>> We're still collecting information on hotels which should be on the >>>> etherpad later today. >>>> >>>> Thanks, looking forward to seeing everyone I missed in Paris! >>>> Kyle >>>> >>>>  https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/neutron-kilo-midcycle >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list >>>> OpenStackfirstname.lastname@example.org >>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list >>> OpenStackemail@example.com >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStackfirstname.lastname@example.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStackemail@example.com > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStackfirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev