+1. I always hesitate to abandon someone's patch because it is so personal. The auto-expire is impersonal and procedural. I agree that 1 week is too soon. Give it at least a month.
Abandoned patches that have some importance shouldn't ever really be lost. They should be linked to bug reports or blueprints to which they're related. So, why do we need to keep them around while there is no activity on them? Carl On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Collins, Sean <sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com> wrote: > Perhaps we should re-introduce the auto-expiration of patches, albeit on > a very leisurely timeframe. Before, it was like 1 week to expire a > patch, which was a bit aggressive. Perhaps we could auto-expire patches > that haven't been touched in 4 or 6 weeks, to expire patches that have > truly been abandoned by authors? > > -- > Sean M. Collins > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev