Rob Basham

Cloud Systems Software Architecture

Bartosz Kupidura <> wrote on 11/25/2014 05:21:59 AM:

> From: Bartosz Kupidura <>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" 
> <>
> Date: 11/25/2014 05:26 AM
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [FUEL] Zabbix in HA mode
> Hello All,
> Im working on Zabbix implementation which include HA support.
> Zabbix server should be deployed on all controllers in HA mode.
> Currently we have dedicated role 'zabbix-server', which does not support 
> than one zabbix-server. Instead of this we will move monitoring 
> solution (zabbix), 
> as an additional component.
> We will introduce additional role 'zabbix-monitoring', assigned to 
> all servers with 
> lowest priority in serializer (run puppet after every other roles) 
> when zabbix is 
> enabled.
> 'Zabbix-monitoring' role will be assigned automatically.
> When zabbix component is enabled, we will install zabbix-server on 
> all controllers 
> in active-backup mode (pacemaker+haproxy).
> In next stage, we can allow users to deploy zabbix-server on dedicated 
node OR
> on controllers for performance reasons.
> But for now we should force zabbix-server to be deployed on controllers.
> BP is in initial phase, but code is ready and working with Fuel 5.1. 
> Now im checking if it works with master.
> Any comments are welcome!

This is of limited value to my business due to the GPL license -- so my 
company's lawyers tell me.  I will be unable to take advantage of what 
looks to be a solid solution from what I can see of Zabbix.  Are there any 
risks to Fuel (open source contamination) from this approach?  I doubt it 
but I want to make sure you are considering this.

> BP link:
> Best Regards,
> Bartosz Kupidura
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev mailing list

Reply via email to