On Dec 10, 2014, at 3:26 PM, Joshua Harlow <harlo...@outlook.com> wrote:
> Hi oslo folks (and others), > > I've recently put up a review for some common deprecation patterns: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/140119/ > > In summary, this is a common set of patterns that can be used by oslo > libraries, other libraries... This is different from the versionutils one > (which is more of a developer<->operator deprecation interaction) and is more > focused on the developer <-> developer deprecation interaction (developers > say using oslo libraries). > > Doug had the question about why not just put this out there on pypi with a > useful name not so strongly connected to oslo; since that review is more of a > common set of patterns that can be used by libraries outside openstack/oslo > as well. There wasn't many/any similar libraries that I found > (zope.deprecation is probably the closest) and twisted has something in-built > to it that is something similar. So in order to avoid creating our own > version of zope.deprecation in that review we might as well create a neat > name that can be useful for oslo/openstack/elsewhere... > > Some ideas that were thrown around on IRC (check > 'https://pypi.python.org/pypi/%s' % name for 404 to see if likely not > registered): > > * debtcollector +1 I suspect we’ll want a minimal spec for the new lib, but let’s wait and hear what some of the other cores think. Doug > * bagman > * deprecate > * deprecation > * baggage > > Any other neat names people can think about? > > Or in general any other comments/ideas about providing such a deprecation > pattern library? > > -Josh > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
