I would hope yes to all, but there is a lot of hard work there. Some things there require neutron to configure physical switches. Some require a guest agent in the image to get cinder working, or cinder controlled hardware. And all require developers interested enough in making it happen.
No time frame on any of it. Thanks, Kevin ________________________________ From: xianchaobo Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 1:07:54 AM To: [email protected] Cc: Luohao (brian) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Some questions about Ironic service Hi,Fox Kevin M Thanks for your help. Also,I want to know whether these features will be implemented in Ironic? Do we have a plan to implement them? Thanks Xianchaobo From: Fox, Kevin M [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 5:52 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Cc: Luohao (brian) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Some questions about Ironic service No to questions 1, 3, and 4. Yes to 2, but very minimally. ________________________________ From: xianchaobo Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 10:29:50 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Cc: Luohao (brian) Subject: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Some questions about Ironic service Hello, all I’m trying to install and configure Ironic service, something confused me. I create two neutron networks, public network and private network. Private network is used to deploy physical machines Public network is used to provide floating ip. (1) Private network type can be VLAN or VXLAN? (In install guide, the network type is flat) (2) The network of deployed physical machines can be managed by neutron? (3) Different tenants can have its own network to manage physical machines? (4) Does the ironic provide some mechanism for deployed physical machines to use storage such as shared storage,cinder volume? Thanks, XianChaobo
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
