On 12/16/2014 04:21 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> The issue with stable/juno jobs failing because of the difference in the
> SQLAlchemy requirements between the older applications and the newer
> oslo.db is being addressed with a new release of the 1.2.x series. We 
> will then cap the requirements for stable/juno to 1.2.1. We decided we
> did not need to raise the minimum version of oslo.db allowed in kilo,
> because the old versions of the library do work, if they are installed
> from packages and not through setuptools.
> 
> Jeremy created a feature/1.2 branch for us, and I have 2 patches up
> [1][2] to apply the requirements fix. The change to the oslo.db version
> in stable/juno is [3].
> 
> After the changes in oslo.db merge, I will tag 1.2.1.
> 
> Doug
> 
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/141893/
> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/141894/
> [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/141896/

Doug,

I'm not sure I get it. Is this related to newer versions of SQLAlchemy?
If so, then from my package maintainer point of view, keeping an older
version of SQLA (eg: 0.9.8) and oslo.db 1.0.2 for Juno is ok, right?

Will Kilo require a newer version of SQLA?

Cheers,

Thomas


_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to