Excerpts from Renat Akhmerov's message of 2014-12-24 03:40:22 -0800:
> Hi
> > Ok, I'm quite happy to accept this may be a better long-term solution, but
> > can anyone comment on the current maturity level of Mistral?  Questions
> > which spring to mind are:
> > 
> > - Is the DSL stable now?
> You can think “yes” because although we keep adding new features we do it in 
> a backwards compatible manner. I personally try to be very cautious about 
> this.
> > - What's the roadmap re incubation (there are a lot of TBD's here:
> >    https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Mistral/Incubation)
> Ooh yeah, this page is very very obsolete which is actually my fault because 
> I didn’t pay a lot of attention to this after I heard all these rumors about 
> TC changing the whole approach around getting projects incubated/integrated.
> I think incubation readiness from a technical perspective is good (various 
> style checks, procedures etc.), even if there’s still something that we need 
> to adjust it must not be difficult and time consuming. The main question for 
> the last half a year has been “What OpenStack program best fits Mistral?”. So 
> far we’ve had two candidates: Orchestration and some new program (e.g. 
> Workflow Service). However, nothing is decided yet on that.

It's probably worth re-thinking the discussion above given the governance
changes that are being worked on:


OpenStack-dev mailing list

Reply via email to