Thanks Clint, I actually didn’t see this before (like I said just rumors) so need to read it carefully.
Renat Akhmerov @ Mirantis Inc. > On 25 Dec 2014, at 00:18, Clint Byrum <[email protected]> wrote: > > Excerpts from Renat Akhmerov's message of 2014-12-24 03:40:22 -0800: >> Hi >> >>> Ok, I'm quite happy to accept this may be a better long-term solution, but >>> can anyone comment on the current maturity level of Mistral? Questions >>> which spring to mind are: >>> >>> - Is the DSL stable now? >> >> You can think “yes” because although we keep adding new features we do it in >> a backwards compatible manner. I personally try to be very cautious about >> this. >> >>> - What's the roadmap re incubation (there are a lot of TBD's here: >>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Mistral/Incubation) >> >> Ooh yeah, this page is very very obsolete which is actually my fault because >> I didn’t pay a lot of attention to this after I heard all these rumors about >> TC changing the whole approach around getting projects incubated/integrated. >> >> I think incubation readiness from a technical perspective is good (various >> style checks, procedures etc.), even if there’s still something that we need >> to adjust it must not be difficult and time consuming. The main question for >> the last half a year has been “What OpenStack program best fits Mistral?”. >> So far we’ve had two candidates: Orchestration and some new program (e.g. >> Workflow Service). However, nothing is decided yet on that. >> > > It's probably worth re-thinking the discussion above given the governance > changes that are being worked on: > > http://governance.openstack.org/resolutions/20141202-project-structure-reform-spec.html > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
