On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 07:39:59AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: > On 01/14/2015 04:08 AM, Dr. Jens Rosenboom wrote: > > Am 14/01/15 um 05:17 schrieb Adam Gandelman: > >> So eventlet 0.16.x has started hitting slaves and breaking stable > >> branches > >> (its not like we weren't warned :\ ) > >> > >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1410626 > >> > >> Should hopefully be resolved by eventlet versions caps in icehouse + > >> juno's > >> requirements: > >> > >> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/I4bbbeb5bf9c22ed36f5c9a74fec6b487d2c15697,n,z > >> > > > > It was discussed already in the context of > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1407685 that capping eventlet would > > not be the proper solution, instead there is a fix already in master > > which has backports to icehouse + juno pending: > > > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/145955/ > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/146096/ > > > > Or is this new bug triggered by a different piece of code relating to > > the newly released eventlet 0.16.1? > > Capping in stable/* is fine. A real openstack installation will not > randomly rev all the dependent libraries to a latest version. Assuming > that they will do so is misguided at best. > > There was real concern in getting master to work correctly, which was > done. But for stable, capping is the right answer.
The patch that went into master is pretty trivial really. I don't see a reason to not just copy that into stable too. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
