On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Kyle/all, > > (we were going to walk thru that on Mon, but since US is on vacation > today, sending it via email to openstack-dev@.) > > Great, thanks Ihar! > So I've talked to Doug Hellmann from oslo, and here is what we have in our > oslo queue to consider: > > 1. minor oslo.concurrency cleanup for *aas repos (we need to drop > lockutils-wrapper usage now that base test class sets lockutils fixture); > 2. migration to namespace-less oslo libraries (this is blocked by pending > oslo.messaging release scheduled this week, will revive patches for all > four branches the end of the week) [1]; > 3. oslo/kilo-2: graduation of oslo.policy; > 4. oslo/kilo-3: graduation of oslo.cache, oslo.versionedobjects. > > I believe 1. and 2. should be handled in Kilo-2 neutron side. The 2. part > will introduce some potential friction in gate due to merge conflicts and > new hacking rule applied, so we may want to synchronize it with other > refactoring activities. > > This looks good to me. > For 3., I'm not sure we want to go with such a change this cycle. On the > other side, while that is potentially unsafe, it may free us from later > patching our local policy module copy due to security issues that could be > revealed later in the incubator module. Taking into account that we claim > support for 15 months for all stable branches, and who knows where it will > lead later, earlier reducing our area of responsibility can be a good thing. > > Given the state of our policy code, we may want to look into this one for Kilo yet. It would be good to get Salv's opinion here as well. > For 4., this will definitely need to wait for L. The oslo.cache migration > can easily go with in L-1 (the module is used in single place only - > metadata agent); as for oslo.versionedobjects, this will need to follow a > proper spec process (we had someone willing to post a spec for that, but I > don't remember his/her name). > > Does the plan sound ok? > > This all looks good to me! I'd like to explore the oslo.policy stuff a bit more before declaring it out of Kilo at this point though, but lets see what comes of that. Thanks, Kyle > [1]: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/If0dce29a0980206ace9866112be52 > 9436194d47e,n,z > > /Ihar > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
