Radomir and Matthias,

Has anyone done an inventory of xstatic packages that are available as
system packages? I ask because I started asking these questions after doing
a cursory inventory and finding few xstatic packages as system packages. It
appeared to me that the common case was the one Matthias noted where the
xstatic package bundles the js libs. That we're actually getting them from
pypi or a mirror. Can someone show me there really are system packages to
replace the xstatic packages?


On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 5:15 AM, Matthias Runge <mru...@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 22/01/15 09:48, Radomir Dopieralski wrote:
>
> > All of the XStatic packages had to be packaged for the respective
> > distributions in order to package Horizon. That was a lot of work, but
> > it has been done my the packagers of the distributions. As far as I
> > understand, most of those XStatic packages are just dummies, pointing to
> > the actual system-wide JavaScript packages -- XStatic has such a
> > capability. So while we are indeed maintaining some of the XStatic
> > packages for our own convenience, the packages that contain actual code
> > in the distributions are maintained by those distributions' packagers.
> >
> Yupp,
>
> poniting to system packages is something, which makes the XStatic
> approach way more acceptable.
> But, if you don't have them (yet), xstatic packages will bundle js libs
> for you.
>
> Matthias
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to