On 3/4/15 11:31 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Flavio Percoco wrote:
I personally don't think adding new cores without cleaning up that
list is something healthy for our community, which is what we're
trying to improve here. Therefore I'm still -2-W on adding new folks
without removing non-active core members.

It's also *extremely* easy to add back long-inactive members if they
happen to come back.

Again, core is not a badge, it corresponds to a set of duties. If some
people don't fill those duties anymore, it's better to remove them than
to keep them around: it maintains the standards of expected review
activity fore core reviewers at a high level.

While I long to have more time to properly contribute to glance and I miss the time when I did, as an inactive core member I also agree that rotation makes sense.

OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

Reply via email to