Am 05/03/15 um 17:52 schrieb Doug Hellmann:

On Thu, Mar 5, 2015, at 11:37 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote:
The clients in general do not back port patches. Someone should work with
stable-maint to raise the cap in Icehouse and Juno. I suspect, however,
that those caps were added due to the client breaking other projects.
Proposals can be made though and ideally, openstack/requirements’ gate
jobs will catch any breakage.

Under my cross-project spec proposal [1], we will want to start managing
stable branches for clients specifically for this sort of situation.



Do you expect this proposal to be applied retrospectively to create stable/{icehouse,juno} branches or will this only be applied starting from Kilo onwards?

Also, your proposal is talking about libraries in general, is there consensus on having the python-*client projects being included there? Or would it make sense to mention them explicitly?

I'm a bit worried that we have a bug currently making nova and cinder API services explode after some uptime and no shorttern way of fixing this bug in the stable branches.

OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Reply via email to