Am 05/03/15 um 17:52 schrieb Doug Hellmann:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015, at 11:37 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote:
The clients in general do not back port patches. Someone should work with
stable-maint to raise the cap in Icehouse and Juno. I suspect, however,
that those caps were added due to the client breaking other projects.
Proposals can be made though and ideally, openstack/requirements’ gate
jobs will catch any breakage.
Under my cross-project spec proposal [1], we will want to start managing
stable branches for clients specifically for this sort of situation.
Doug
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/155072/
Do you expect this proposal to be applied retrospectively to create
stable/{icehouse,juno} branches or will this only be applied starting
from Kilo onwards?
Also, your proposal is talking about libraries in general, is there
consensus on having the python-*client projects being included there? Or
would it make sense to mention them explicitly?
I'm a bit worried that we have a bug currently making nova and cinder
API services explode after some uptime and no shorttern way of fixing
this bug in the stable branches.
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
