Russell Bryant wrote: > One point of clarification: > > On 03/10/2015 02:28 PM, Gabriel Hurley wrote: >> Even more concerning is the sentiment of "projects we want to >> consciously drop" from Russell's original email. > > This was in reference to criteria defined in: > > http://governance.openstack.org/reference/incubation-integration-requirements.html > > For example, we previously had a strict requirement *against* > duplication of functionality among OpenStack projects unless it was with > intent and with a clear plan to replace the old thing. In this new > model, that would be a requirement we would consciously drop.
It's a requirement we *already* consciously dropped when we approved the new projects requirements. Or do you mean you want to come back on that decision[1]? We can refine those rules as we go and consider applications and realize the rules are incomplete... But denying their existence and ask to freeze until they are defined sounds a bit weird. The rules are there. Slow consideration of additions is the way to make iterative progress, not freezing. [1] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/commit/?id=fcc4046f7d866d0516f2810571aad0c0ce2cc361 -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev