On 2015-03-10 14:42:18 -0400 (-0400), Russell Bryant wrote: [...] > As to specific tags, I refer back to this: > > http://governance.openstack.org/reference/incubation-integration-requirements.html > > We worked pretty hard to come up with useful things for projects > to aim for. In fact, we considered it a minimum. Let's make sure > we capture the things we still value, which I believe is most of > it. [...]
Coming from a "horizontal" resource and facilitation perspective, we previously had guidelines like these to help prioritize where effort is focused. I was hoping that most of the incubation requirements would become tags in some form so that support decisions could still be made based on them. Otherwise I worry we're stuck relying on tags which merely declare the set of projects each horizontal team has chosen as a priority (in situations where there are ongoing demands on team members available time to help those specific projects). Yes, horizontal teams should provide the means for OpenStack projects to support themselves where possible, but some activities do not scale linearly and do necessitate hard support decisions. Guidance from the community as to where it's most effective to spend those limited resources is appreciated, and also increases the chances that in those situations the prioritized subset overlaps substantially between various limited resources (which provides a more consistent experience and helps set expectations). -- Jeremy Stanley __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
