Hi Mike, Thanks a lot for your quick reply which is very useful to me.
On 06/09/2015 07:08 PM, Mike Bayer wrote: > On 6/9/15 9:26 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The python-sqlalchemy package has been uploaded to Debian Experimental, >> and is about to be uploaded to Debian Unstable. So I wonder what's the >> state of the project regarding upgrading SQLA. >> >> Maybe Mike can tell what kind of issue we may run into? How much work >> will it be to switch to SQLA 1.0.x for Liberty? Is it possible to be >> compatible with both 9.x and 1.x (which would be the best way forward)? > > The short answer is that there are no supported use cases that have been > intentionally changed in any backwards incompatible way in 1.0 and all > Openstack code should be able to accommodate from 0.9.x -> 1.0.x without > any change. Ah, super cool! I saw that this passed all tests: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/189847/ Could we get it approved? Mike __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
