On 06/10/2015 04:52 PM, Mike Bayer wrote: > > > On 6/10/15 3:26 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> Hi Mike, >> >> Thanks a lot for your quick reply which is very useful to me. >> >> On 06/09/2015 07:08 PM, Mike Bayer wrote: >>> On 6/9/15 9:26 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> The python-sqlalchemy package has been uploaded to Debian Experimental, >>>> and is about to be uploaded to Debian Unstable. So I wonder what's the >>>> state of the project regarding upgrading SQLA. >>>> >>>> Maybe Mike can tell what kind of issue we may run into? How much work >>>> will it be to switch to SQLA 1.0.x for Liberty? Is it possible to be >>>> compatible with both 9.x and 1.x (which would be the best way forward)? >>> The short answer is that there are no supported use cases that have been >>> intentionally changed in any backwards incompatible way in 1.0 and all >>> Openstack code should be able to accommodate from 0.9.x -> 1.0.x without >>> any change. >> Ah, super cool! >> >> I saw that this passed all tests: >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/189847/ > > whew! :)
Do you know why it fails with Kilo? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/190062/ Thomas __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
