On 06/12/2015 12:34 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 06/10/2015 11:23 PM, Mike Bayer wrote: >> >> >> On 6/10/15 5:18 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: >>> On 06/10/2015 04:52 PM, Mike Bayer wrote: >>>> whew! :) >>> Do you know why it fails with Kilo? >>> >>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/190062/ >> >> I noticed this, I don't know very well how the requirements get >> distributed around but seems like it is not happening here: >> >> http://logs.openstack.org/62/190062/2/check/check-grenade-dsvm/d4597a4/logs/grenade.sh.txt.gz >> >> pkg_resources.ContextualVersionConflict: (SQLAlchemy 1.0.5 >> (/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages), >> Requirement.parse('SQLAlchemy<=0.9.99,>=0.9.7'), set(['oslo.db'])) > > Yeah, so we are bitten by over-restricting requirements in oslo.db. > Nothing which can't be fixed, IMO. > > Would it be ok to first fix oslo.db, and then unrestrict in > global-requirements.txt? Is this the way to go? > > I really would love to see this fixed in the Kilo branch, because no > mater what, SQLAlchemy 1.0.x will be uploaded to Sid, and I'd prefer > that it doesn't just break hard Kilo which is there... > > Cheers, > > Thomas Goirand (zigo)
FYI: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/190848/ (I don't have the CI result as of writing...) Thomas __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev