On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Jay Pipes <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 07/15/2015 03:27 PM, John Griffith wrote: > >> It's relatively limited right now I think, and part of the reason for >> that is we've tried to ensure that the information that we put on tags >> is subjective >> > > I think you mean "objective" here, and throughout this, not "subjective". > We try as much as possible for the tag definitions to have a clear list of > requirements -- preferably driven by some data source like a script that > queries stackalytics -- that can be used in applying the tag to a project. GAAHHHHH... YES, you're correct!!! I did mean "objective", sorry that was terrible. > > > >, and at the same time doesn't give any false impression > >> that something is "good" or "bad". We just wanted to have tags to >> easily convey some general information about a project to help people >> gain at least a little insight into a project, how it's managed, what >> sort of community is contributing to it etc. >> >> As we move into things like the "compute starter kit" it gets a bit less >> subjective, but not really too much. > > > It got a bit *more* subjective, not less subjective :) Or perhaps you > meant "prescriptive"? > Yes, thank you! That's awfully embarrassing. > > Best, > -jay > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
