yep ttx. this will be for Mitaka. -- Dims
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 6:18 AM, Thierry Carrez <[email protected]> wrote: > Flavio Percoco wrote: > > On 25/08/15 06:01 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > >> Morgan, > >> > >> Bit more radical :) I am inclined to just yank all code from > >> oslo-incubator and > >> let the projects modify/move what they have left into their own > >> package/module > >> structure (and change the contracts however they see fit). > > > > Glad this conversation is happening, I've started to think about this > > as well. I think we're at a point were we could just let projects move > > from were they are. > > > > However, I'd like this to be a bit more organized. For instance, if we > > dismiss oslo-incubator and let projects move forward on their own, > > it'd be better to have all the `openstack/common/` packages renamed so > > that it'll create less confusion to newcomers. At the very least, as > > Morgan mentioned, these packages could be prefixed with an `_` and > > become 'private' and 'owned' by the project. > > > > We still need a 'deprecation' process for the code in the > > oslo-incubator repository and we would still have to accept fixes for > > previous releases. > > The Death of the Incubator. Sounds like a great thing to discuss at the > Design Summit. I don't think we would kill it before start of Mitaka > anyway ? > > -- > Thierry Carrez (ttx) > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > -- Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
