On Nov 20, 2015, at 6:18, Sean Dague <s...@dague.net> wrote: > instance_actions seems extremely useful, and at the ops meetups I've > been to has been one of the favorite features because it allows and easy > interface for "going back in time" to figure out what happened.
Agreed, we're using it because it's such a quick and easy way to see what actions have been taken on an instance when users need support. We're not yet collecting notifications from the queue -- we do have them being dumped to the logs that are splunk searchable. So far, it hasn't been "easy" to look at instance action history that way. > I'd suggest the following: > > 1. soft deleting and instance does nothing with instance actions. > > 2. archiving instance (soft delete -> actually deleted) also archives > off instance actions. > > 3. update instance_actions API so that you can get instance_actions for > deleted instances (which I think doesn't work today). +1 I kept trying to craft a reply to this thread and fortunately I waited long enough that someone else said exactly what I was trying to say. -melanie (irc: melwitt)
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
