On 2016-02-03 14:32:36 +0000 (+0000), Sam Yaple wrote: [...] > Luckily, digging into it it appears cinder already has all the > infrastructure in place to handle what we had talked about in a > separate email thread Duncan. It is very possible Ekko can > leverage the existing features to do it's backup with no change > from Cinder. [...]
<devils_advocate>If Cinder's backup facilities already do most of what you want from it and there's only a little bit of development work required to add the missing feature, why jump to implementing this feature in a completely separate project instead rather than improving Cinder's existing solution so that people who have been using that can benefit directly?</devils_advocate> -- Jeremy Stanley __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
