On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> wrote:
> On 2016-02-03 14:32:36 +0000 (+0000), Sam Yaple wrote: > [...] > > Luckily, digging into it it appears cinder already has all the > > infrastructure in place to handle what we had talked about in a > > separate email thread Duncan. It is very possible Ekko can > > leverage the existing features to do it's backup with no change > > from Cinder. > [...] > > <devils_advocate>If Cinder's backup facilities already do most of > what you want from it and there's only a little bit of development > work required to add the missing feature, why jump to implementing > this feature in a completely separate project instead rather than > improving Cinder's existing solution so that people who have been > using that can benefit directly?</devils_advocate> > Backing up Cinder was never the initial goal, just a potential feature on the roadmap. Nova is the main goal.
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
