From: Sylvain Bauza <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Thursday 10 March 2016 at 10:04
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all][zaqar][cloudkitty] Default ports list



Le 09/03/2016 23:41, Matt Fischer a écrit :
This is not the first time. Monasca and Murano had a collision too[1]. When 
this happens the changes trickle down into automation tools also and 
complicates things.

[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1505785


IMHO, all that info has to be standardized in the Service Catalog. That's where 
endpoint informations can be found for a specific service type and that's the 
basement for cross-project communication.

FWIW, there is one cross-project spec trying to clean-up the per-project bits 
that are not common 
https://github.com/openstack/openstack-specs/blob/master/specs/service-catalog.rst

I'm torn between 2 opinions :
 - either we consider that all those endpoints are (or should be - for those 
which aren't) manageable thru config options, and thus that's not a problem we 
should solve. Any operator can then modify the ports to make sure that two 
conflicting big-tent projects can work together.
 - or, we say that it can be a concern for interoperability, and then we should 
somehow ensure that all projects can work together. Then, a documentation link 
isn't enough IMHO, we should rather test that.


If we can make it so that there are reasonable port commonalities between 
OpenStack clouds, this would be good. Clearly, the service catalog is the 
master so I don’t think there is an interoperability concern but having each of 
the projects using different ports would simplify some of the smaller 
configurations with multiple services on a single box.

This does assume that there are less big tent projects than available TCP/IP 
ports :-)

Tim





On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Xav Paice 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
From an ops point of view, this would be extremely helpful information to share 
with various teams around an organization.  Even a simple wiki page would be 
great.

On 10 March 2016 at 10:35, Fei Long Wang 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi all,

Yesterday I just found cloudkitty is using the same default port (8888) which 
is used by Zaqar now. So I'm wondering if there is any rule/policy for those 
new services need to be aware. I googled but can't find anything about this. 
The only link I can find is 
http://docs.openstack.org/liberty/config-reference/content/firewalls-default-ports.html.
 So my question is should we document the default ports list on an official 
place given the big tent mode? Thanks.

--
Cheers & Best regards,
Fei Long Wang (王飞龙)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Senior Cloud Software Engineer
Tel: +64-48032246<tel:%2B64-48032246>
Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Catalyst IT Limited
Level 6, Catalyst House, 150 Willis Street, Wellington
--------------------------------------------------------------------------


__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: 
[email protected]?subject:unsubscribe<http://[email protected]?subject:unsubscribe>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: 
[email protected]?subject:unsubscribe<http://[email protected]?subject:unsubscribe>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev





__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: 
[email protected]?subject:unsubscribe<mailto:[email protected]?subject:unsubscribe>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to