On 10/03/16 13:28 +0000, Chris Dent wrote:
On Thu, 10 Mar 2016, Sean Dague wrote:These are HTTP services. They really shoudn't be claiming new ports, they should be running on a real webserver on 80 or 443. There is some legacy there with the original services that we are churning through. It would be nice if new services *started* with staying on wsgi only, and stopped grabbing random ports.+many. It would be great if we just got rid of the runnable web servers in the projects and just expose wsgi apps (the tools like devstack etc mounted under whatever the available server is).
FWIW, Zaqar doesn't ship a wsgi container. It's a pure wsgi app. I think the issue Fei Long is raising here is w.r.t the gate. From a Zaqar perspective, I wouldn't be too worried and as far as the gate goes, I think it'd be more than fine to just switch from using wsgiref in the gate to using httpd. This is to say, I agree with Chris's and Sean's statements.
Also, as already stated sort of vaguely earlier in the thread, isn't it the case that if you aren't using the service catalog to find an endpoint, you're doing it wrong?
++ Flavio -- @flaper87 Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
