So, if this is about preserving CI time, then its cool for me to merge these on a US Sunday when the gate is otherwise idle, right?
Michael On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 7:02 AM, Sean Dague <s...@dague.net> wrote: > On 08/18/2016 04:46 PM, Michael Still wrote: > > We're still ok with merging existing ones though? > > Mostly we'd like to conserve the CI time now. It's about 14.5 node-hours > to run CI on these patches (probably on about 9 node-hours in the gate). > With ~800 nodes every patch represents 1.5% of our CI resources (per > hour) to pass through. There are a ton of these patches up there, so > even just landing gating ones consumes resources that could go towards > other more critical fixes / features. > > I think the theory is these are fine to merge post freeze / milestone 3, > when the CI should have cooled down a bit and there is more head room. > > -Sean > > -- > Sean Dague > http://dague.net > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Rackspace Australia
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
