On 08/22/2016 12:10 AM, Michael Still wrote:
So, if this is about preserving CI time, then its cool for me to merge these on a US Sunday when the gate is otherwise idle, right?
yes.
Michael On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 7:02 AM, Sean Dague <s...@dague.net <mailto:s...@dague.net>> wrote: On 08/18/2016 04:46 PM, Michael Still wrote: > We're still ok with merging existing ones though? Mostly we'd like to conserve the CI time now. It's about 14.5 node-hours to run CI on these patches (probably on about 9 node-hours in the gate). With ~800 nodes every patch represents 1.5% of our CI resources (per hour) to pass through. There are a ton of these patches up there, so even just landing gating ones consumes resources that could go towards other more critical fixes / features. I think the theory is these are fine to merge post freeze / milestone 3, when the CI should have cooled down a bit and there is more head room. -Sean -- Sean Dague http://dague.net __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe <http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev> -- Rackspace Australia __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-- Sean Dague http://dague.net __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
