Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2016-09-09 14:30:29 -0400: >> > To me, this statement >>> about One OpenStack is about emphasizing those commonalities and >>> working together to increase them, with the combined goals of >>> improving the user and operator experience of using OpenStack and >>> improving our own experience of making it. >> >> +1000 to the above, and I don't believe anything about my stance that >> OpenStack should be a cloud toolkit goes against that. >> >> The wording/philosophy that I disagree with is the "one product" thing :) > > Tomato, tomato. > > We're all, I think, looking at this "One OpenStack" principle from > different perspectives. You say "a toolkit". I say "a project". > Thierry said "a product". The important word in all of those phrases > is "a" -- as in singular.
FWIW I agree with Jay that the wording "a product" is definitely outdated and does not represent the current reality. "Product" presupposes a level of integration that we never achieved, and which is, in my opinion, not desirable at this stage. I think that saying "a framework" would be more accurate today. Something like "OpenStack is one community with one common mission, producing one framework of collaborating components" would capture my thinking. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
