On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> wrote: > Emilien Macchi wrote: >> I would like to request for some space dedicated to TripleO project >> for the first OpenStack PTG. >> >> https://www.openstack.org/ptg/ >> >> The event will happen in February 2017 during the next PTG in Atlanta. >> Any feedback is welcome, > > Just a quick note: as you can imagine we have finite space at the event, > and the OpenStack Foundation wants to give priority to teams which have > a diverse affiliation (or which are not tagged "single-vendor"). > Depending on which teams decide to take advantage of the event and which > don't, we may or may not be able to offer space to single-vendor > projects -- and TripleO is currently tagged single-vendor.
I understand that space is limited and it is true to mention TripleO has the single-vendor tag. Although this tag, TripleO has a lot of horizontal interactions with others projects in OpenStack: - Ironic, used to bootstrap the TripleO overcloud. Ironic folks could weight we have a bunch of common work there. - Heat, used to orchestrate the TripleO overcloud deployment (and soon the undercloud too). - Puppet OpenStack modules. Despite PuppetOpenStack project might skip PTG because we don't need it  until now, we still have a lot of collaboration between both groups. - OpenStack Infra. TripleO & Infra folks keep increasing the collaboration on multiple topics (third party CI, multinode jobs, etc).  http://osdir.com/ml/openstack-dev/2016-10/msg00311.html I might have missed it, but did we document PTG allocation space priorities? If not, we might want to make it clear in the single-vendor tag doc. I'm concerned by the fact whether or not space is granted for a project would be a subjective decision to take. > The rationale is, the more organizations are involved in a given project > team, the more value there is to offer common meeting space to that team > for them to sync on priorities and get stuff done. If more than 90% of > contributions / reviews / core reviewers come from a single > organization, there is less coordination needs and less value in having > all those people from a single org to travel to a distant place to have > a team meeting. And as far as recruitment of new team members go (to > increase that diversity), the OpenStack Summit will be a better venue to > do that. > > I hope we'll be able to accommodate you, though. And in all cases > TripleO people are more than welcome to join the event to coordinate > with other teams. It's just not 100% sure we'll be able to give you a > dedicated room for multiple days. We should know better in a week or so, > once we get a good idea of who plans to meet at the event and who doesn't. ack. I'll follow what happens. I appreciate your quick feedback, that will let us to find a fallback in case of rejection. Thanks, -- Emilien Macchi __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev