Hi zengchen,
Yeah, the constraint looks incorrect. Not sure if we got it wrong or manila
has changed it afterwards. It would be good raise a bug/propose a fix.
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 8:26 AM, zengchen <chenzeng...@163.com> wrote:
> Hi, Heat stackers:
> May I ask a question about creating Manila Share. I see Heat define
> some constraints
> for property schema 'ACCESS_TYPE' at
> heat.engine.resources.openstack.manila.share.properties_schema[ACCESS_
> RULES].
> I copy the codes as bellow. The allowed values for 'ACCESS_TYPE' are 'ip',
> 'domain'.
>
> ACCESS_TYPE: properties.Schema(
> properties.Schema.STRING,
> _('Type of access that should be provided to guest.'),
> constraints=[constraints.AllowedValues(
> ['ip', 'domain'])],
> required=True
> ),
>
> However, I see manila has defined different allowed value for 'ACCESS_TYPE',
> which
>
> includes 'ip', 'user', 'cert', 'cephx'. So, my question is does heat need
> some updates? Or
>
> do I miss something? Hope for your reply. Thanks very much!
>
>
> cheers
>
> zengchen
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
--
Regards,
Rabi Misra
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
