Rabi Mishra & Rico Lin:
Thanks very much for your reply!
I have submitted a bug report at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1649217, and will submit a patch to fix it
later.
cheers
zengchen
在 2016-12-09 12:45:01，"Rabi Mishra" <[email protected]> 写道：
Hi zengchen,
Yeah, the constraint looks incorrect. Not sure if we got it wrong or manila has
changed it afterwards. It would be good raise a bug/propose a fix.
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 8:26 AM, zengchen <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi, Heat stackers:
May I ask a question about creating Manila Share. I see Heat define some
constraints
for property schema 'ACCESS_TYPE' at
heat.engine.resources.openstack.manila.share.properties_schema[ACCESS_RULES].
I copy the codes as bellow. The allowed values for 'ACCESS_TYPE' are 'ip',
'domain'.
ACCESS_TYPE: properties.Schema(
properties.Schema.STRING,
_('Type of access that should be provided to guest.'),
constraints=[constraints.AllowedValues(
['ip', 'domain'])],
required=True
),
However, I see manila has defined different allowed value for 'ACCESS_TYPE',
which
includes 'ip', 'user', 'cert', 'cephx'. So, my question is does heat need some
updates? Or
do I miss something? Hope for your reply. Thanks very much!
cheers
zengchen
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Regards,
Rabi Misra
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
