I'm uncertain whether it is acceptable, but I think it is worth to nominate him.
KATO Tomoyuki > Following on from this: some of you may know Hugh Blemings, who writes the > 'Last Week on OpenStack-Dev' newsletter > (http://hugh.blemings.id.au/openstack/lwood/). > > I believe Hugh provides a valuable service for the community, and I think > this is probably worthy of a vote (which is > the main benefit of ATC status after Barcelona). Do you think we should offer > him extra-ATC status in docs because of > his work with making sense of the dev list? > > Interested in your thoughts. > > (Disclosure: Hugh is a colleague and long-time friend of mine through Linux > Australia) > > Lana > > > On 11/08/16 09:28, Lana Brindley wrote: > > Hi cores, > > > > Are you aware of anyone who should be granted Extra ATC status? From Doug's > > email to the dev list: > > > >> Following the Foundation bylaws [1] and TC Charter [2], Project > >> teams should identify contributors who have had a significant impact > >> this cycle but who would not qualify for ATC status using the regular > >> process because they have not submitted a patch. > > > > In the past, docs have given extra ATC status to people who participated in > > docs sprints, as an example. If you know > of anyone, let's shop the idea on this list. We need to have our proposals to > Foundation by 16 August, so we don't have > much time. > > > > Thanks, > > Lana > > > > > > > > > > -- > Lana Brindley > Technical Writer > Rackspace Cloud Builders Australia > http://lanabrindley.com -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-doc-core Post to : openstack-doc-core@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-doc-core More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp