Mark McLoughlin wrote: >> Making our multiple projects converge onto consolidated and >> well-accepted APIs is a bit painful work, but it is a prerequisite to >> turning openstack-common into a proper library (or set of libraries). >> >> I'd say the whole thing suffers from not having a proper >> team/leader/coordinator dedicated to it: relying on existing, >> overstretched PTLs to lead that effort might not be the fastest path. > > While I was on vacation, I read in the weekly newsletter: > > "It developed into a request for leadership for openstack-common" > > and was like "WTF do you call the work that e.g. I, Jason, Russell and > Doug have been doing?" > > But I see your point is a little different - you feel there should be an > elected/appointed "PTL without a PPB vote" or whatever to represent the > project. I guess that could help clarify things since it's what folks > are used to with other projects.
Right. So far we said that openstack-common was driven by "all the PTLs", but that didn't prove particularly fast and efficient. Having a clear face associated with it, someone specific taking the "lead" on this project, will, I think, help a bit in getting to the next step. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) Release Manager, OpenStack _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp