Am 21.08.2014 15:01, schrieb Guillaume Gardet: > Le 21/08/2014 14:49, Andreas Färber a écrit : >> Dropping the downstream Raspberry Pi kernel and merging :upstream into >> Contrib:RaspberryPi would seem like a nice cleanup btw. Requires the >> fixed kernel to get built, of course. > > Would be nice to check if omxplayer (hardware accelerated video decoder > availaible in packman repo) is working fine with upstream kernel. > Otherwise, we should keep downstream kernel to keep this main feature of > the raspberry pi.
Is that really a criteria? packman is not part of openSUSE, right? My point here was that in order to build "real" JeOS images (which didn't build last time I checked) Alex linked Kernel:HEAD kernel-source into Contrib:RaspberryPi:upstream, because unfortunately that otherwise inherits kernel-source from Contrib:RaspberryPi, which is the downstream kernel. I don't mind keeping the downstream kernel, but in that case we need a different project setup. For instance, Contrib:RaspberryPi:downstream. dtb-source is the other package dependent on the right kernel-source. Or maybe we can just get JeOS-RaspberryPi into Factory:ARM now and drop :upstream? The firmware blobs for the FAT partition are probably not in Factory though? Could we submit them to Factory:ARM? Andreas -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]
