Op 09-11-16 om 23:27 schreef Alexander Graf:

Am 09.11.2016 um 12:20 schrieb Brüns, Stefan <[email protected]>:

On Mittwoch, 9. November 2016 17:44:16 CET Jogchum Reitsma wrote:
Hi Stefan,

The results:

  - journalctl -b -u NetworkManager
(there is much more output, but I take it this is what you mean:)

nov 09 17:04:11 nohostname NetworkManager[548]: <info>
[1478707451.7727] device (wlan0): set-hw-addr: set MAC address to
8E:07:9D:1E:8C:93 (scanning)
nov 09 17:04:11 nohostname NetworkManager[548]: <info>
[1478707451.8066] device (wlan0): supplicant interface state: completed
-> disabled
nov 09 17:04:11 nohostname NetworkManager[548]: <info>
[1478707451.8078] device (wlan0): supplicant interface state: disabled
-> scanning
nov 09 17:04:12 nohostname NetworkManager[548]: <info>
[1478707452.3294] device (wlan0): supplicant interface state: scanning
-> associating
nov 09 17:04:12 nohostname NetworkManager[548]: <info>
[1478707452.4836] device (wlan0): supplicant interface state:
associating -> associated
nov 09 17:04:13 nohostname NetworkManager[548]: <info>
[1478707453.3429] device (wlan0): supplicant interface state: associated
-> 4-way handshake
nov 09 17:04:13 nohostname NetworkManager[548]: <info>
[1478707453.3706] device (wlan0): supplicant interface state: 4-way
handshake -> completed
nov 09 17:09:27 nohostname NetworkManager[548]: <info>
[1478707767.7887] device (wlan0): set-hw-addr: set MAC address to
56:74:0F:44:0E:15 (scanning)
This is odd. Obviously it has connected to the network successfully. The
scanning actions may be background scans, but it should re-set the mac address
to the one successfully used with the access point previously.

You may try disabling mac randomization temporarily.

Anyway, I think this is worth an upstream bug report.
Could you please try again with a really strong power supply first?


Thanks,

Alex


Power supply until now was 5.2 V, 2A; what should it be?

regards, Jogchum
 5.2 V, 2 A;
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to