> Am 10.11.2016 um 13:34 schrieb Jogchum Reitsma <[email protected]>: > > Op 09-11-16 om 23:27 schreef Alexander Graf: >> >>> Am 09.11.2016 um 12:20 schrieb Brüns, Stefan <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> On Mittwoch, 9. November 2016 17:44:16 CET Jogchum Reitsma wrote: >>>> Hi Stefan, >>>> >>>> The results: >>>> >>>> - journalctl -b -u NetworkManager >>>> (there is much more output, but I take it this is what you mean:) >>>> >>>> nov 09 17:04:11 nohostname NetworkManager[548]: <info> >>>> [1478707451.7727] device (wlan0): set-hw-addr: set MAC address to >>>> 8E:07:9D:1E:8C:93 (scanning) >>>> nov 09 17:04:11 nohostname NetworkManager[548]: <info> >>>> [1478707451.8066] device (wlan0): supplicant interface state: completed >>>> -> disabled >>>> nov 09 17:04:11 nohostname NetworkManager[548]: <info> >>>> [1478707451.8078] device (wlan0): supplicant interface state: disabled >>>> -> scanning >>>> nov 09 17:04:12 nohostname NetworkManager[548]: <info> >>>> [1478707452.3294] device (wlan0): supplicant interface state: scanning >>>> -> associating >>>> nov 09 17:04:12 nohostname NetworkManager[548]: <info> >>>> [1478707452.4836] device (wlan0): supplicant interface state: >>>> associating -> associated >>>> nov 09 17:04:13 nohostname NetworkManager[548]: <info> >>>> [1478707453.3429] device (wlan0): supplicant interface state: associated >>>> -> 4-way handshake >>>> nov 09 17:04:13 nohostname NetworkManager[548]: <info> >>>> [1478707453.3706] device (wlan0): supplicant interface state: 4-way >>>> handshake -> completed >>>> nov 09 17:09:27 nohostname NetworkManager[548]: <info> >>>> [1478707767.7887] device (wlan0): set-hw-addr: set MAC address to >>>> 56:74:0F:44:0E:15 (scanning) >>> This is odd. Obviously it has connected to the network successfully. The >>> scanning actions may be background scans, but it should re-set the mac >>> address >>> to the one successfully used with the access point previously. >>> >>> You may try disabling mac randomization temporarily. >>> >>> Anyway, I think this is worth an upstream bug report. >> Could you please try again with a really strong power supply first? >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Alex >> >> > Power supply until now was 5.2 V, 2A; what should it be?
2A should work, but dropping out wifi is a pretty common symptom of an unreliable power supply. I just want to make sure we're not chasing ghosts ;). Alex -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]
