Thomas Schraitle wrote: > Thanks! I tried it with the documentation page of the openSUSE wiki. > > But ... the problem is still the same. :-( It is just a nice wrapper > around the original text filled with some metainformation. No > semantics.
what I said is that "xml" is nor the problem nor the solution. nowaday anybody do xml. however xml is a very good thing as langage is :-) anybody can read xml (as text), but using the markup is an other thing. Wiki markup is a simplified html. html is already a very unorganised markup and is why it's nearly impossible to write doc in html (anybodu who print html knows that) In fact, the better we can is to translate wiki/html to full text and make a handmade markup. on the contrary it's easy to go from any docbook/novbook/ structured form to html. The result will certainly lose part of the markup though. anyway, all this is _text_ and scripts can be made like sgmltools and linuxdoc to have some kind of compatibility. The truth is that we badly need a wysiwyg xml editor. there are some, but none really satisfactory (neither emacs), so write one should be really a good thing, even for a single dtd anybody must know, however than for reasonably short documents, using an old document as frame to write a new one is not that difficult with any text editor (if I did, you can :-). jdd -- http://www.dodin.net http://dodin.org/galerie_photo_web/expo/index.html http://lucien.dodin.net http://fr.susewiki.org/index.php?title=Gérer_ses_photos --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
