On Monday 16 April 2007 13:59, jdd wrote: > Rebecca Walter wrote: > >> so the question is: do we keep "installation source" or use an other > >> wording? > > what about the fact: > > RPM repository? > > however inst_source was used for years on the net, I'm not sure > changing it is a good idea. May be better a not very good worg well > known than a better unknown :-)
What makes you say installation source is not very good? Only the possible conflict with program sources or do you have another concern? I just want to make sure that I understand everyone's points. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
