Hi jdd, On Montag, 16. April 2007, jdd wrote: > > so the question is: do we keep "installation source" or use an > other wording?
Are any alternatives not a bit too artificial? From my perspective, "installation source" is perfect. :) > the problem comes from the "source" word, it can be confused with > the programm source, often writen only "sources". Generally you write "installation source" alltogether, not separated. If you always use these two words consistently, it should be clear. > This given, very few users need or even know about progamm sources, > so this problem may be secondary Right. :) Bye, Tom -- Thomas Schraitle ---------------------------------------------------------------------- SUSE LINUX GmbH >o) Documentation Specialist Maxfeldstrasse 5 /\\ 90409 Nuernberg _\_v http://en.opensuse.org/Documentation_Team --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
