jdd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Rebecca Walter wrote: > >>> so the question is: do we keep "installation source" or use an other >>> wording? > > what about the fact: > > RPM repository?
And if we switch in some years from RPM to something else? Our trees contain already more than just RPMs, they contain metadata and patches. > however inst_source was used for years on the net, I'm not sure > changing it is a good idea. May be better a not very good worg well > known than a better unknown :-) inst_source could still be an alias for the current YaST module to make the transition easier, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj/ SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
pgpeOPfv4ndWO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
