Marcus Meissner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 11:20:10AM +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote: >> On 25 Apr 2006 at 17:09, Marcus Meissner wrote: >> [...] >> Is there any other change between 1.5.0.1 and 1.5.0.2 other than the version >> number and the security fixes? This security by obscurity just confuses >> users. >> >> Or is the reason that someone just didn't want to touch the RPM spec file?
No, that's not the reason. Developers always like to increase the number ;-) > Because we are in absolutely deep feature freeze. Looking at the diff between our patched 1.5.0.1 version and our patched 1.5.0.2, we decided to move forward and include 1.5.0.3 for RC3. The version number is IMO marketing ;-) Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj/ SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
pgpf0rftF110z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
