On 06/04/26 12:19 (GMT-0400) Andreas Jaeger apparently typed:

> No, that's not the reason.  Developers always like to increase the
> number ;-)

> Looking at the diff between our patched 1.5.0.1 version and our
> patched 1.5.0.2, we decided to move forward and include 1.5.0.3 for
> RC3.  The version number is IMO marketing ;-)

That x.x.x.# version increment is mozilla.org's way of helping the
dozers know there's been a change worth upgrading to get, and making
their automatic updating system work, while ensuring that the more
knowledgeable understand the change is one of two types of serious
unrelated-to-new-features issues, either a security fix, or a crashing
fix. Leaving out either type of fix from distro builds seems bad policy
to me, while incorporating them via backporting without matching the
version seems counterproductive. People who want real version upgrades
to mozilla.org products get the nightly builds of the development
versions, which for the FF line is found at
http://stage.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/latest-mozilla1.8/
for 2.0 or
http://stage.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/latest-trunk/
for 3.0, while
http://stage.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/latest-mozilla1.8.0.3/
has the latest 1.5.0.x builds with the lastest security and/or crash
fixes for the stable release version.
-- 
"Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but
rather expose them."                    Ephesians 5:11 NIV

 Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409

Felix Miata  ***  http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to