On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 02:29:23PM +0200, Klaus Kaempf wrote: > > It looks like you do all this on purpose, just to anoy me. :-D > > Yep. ;-)
I thought so. ;-) > Not quite. SL10.1 libzypp recognizes both and will get confused if it > finds .sel and .pat files. We probably will remove .sel support from > libzypp in SL10.2 rsn. OK. I will post my answer here, even though it actually is a reply to several postings in this thread. 1) On different .sel or .pat on one iso (in one directory) For me it means checking if there are .sel or .pat files and then use the correct way to install it. Will create_package_descr still be able to make .sel files, or will it be completely removed? If removed, a new program might be more interesting. A forked version if you like. This so coninuity is garanteed. I would prefere the program to be able to do both with using an option for the newer package type. 2) On the ability to save Something that realy can become interesting, as you can then save and even more imortandly share it with others. That way I can make a setup that I think is great, put it on my openSUSE.org space and let other people enjoy it. So it would be great if such an option can be read from somewhere else either during installation or later. 3) General notes. As far as I understand, I could just add OOo and then during installation will install all dependencies? What happens when I then want to deinstall OOo? Will it recognise the extra things it installed, or will that still be left behind? What about things I installed with rpm -Uvh? -- houghi Please to not toppost http://houghi.org > You tried, and you failed, so the lesson is, never try. - Homer J. Simpson. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
