On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 02:29:36PM +0200, Dominique Leuenberger wrote: > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10-08-2006 14:45 >>> > >In order not to do again the mistakes made with the zen > >update and 10.1, I think we should have _two_ feature freeze > >dates... > > > >One for the _new things_ (patterns, Xorg 7...) and one for > >the _new releases_ of already used things (Kde, Gnome) > > > >I think the latter are already tested by they developpers > >when the first seems already in a very early stage. > > > >I'm disquieted by the "most annoying bugs" list and the _may > >be_ delayed Alpha 3. > > > >I personnally think that a stable distribution is better > .than the very most up to date one. > > Hi, > > I was also very concerned when I saw the 'most annoying bugs' list > today (as I epxected Alpha 3).
We have Alpha3. Bugs are expected ;) > The worst that can happen to openSUSE is having (again) a release with > bugs like the updater in 10.1. Even though they are fixed now, it's > still around and poeple installing without an internet connection most > obviosuly run into it. > > If the schedule for 10.2 should be kept like this (which I think it > should) then we should try to put bugs away instead of adding > last-minute-features and packages. Some might be solved with new > packages, some might not. Its definitely not last minute for 10.2 yet. CIao, Marcus
