Am Thursday 10 August 2006 15:12 schrieb Silviu Marin-Caea: > On Thursday 10 August 2006 15:27, Marcus Meissner wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 02:29:36PM +0200, Dominique Leuenberger wrote: > > > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10-08-2006 14:45 >>> > > > > > > > >In order not to do again the mistakes made with the zen > > > >update and 10.1, I think we should have _two_ feature freeze > > > >dates... > > > > > > > >One for the _new things_ (patterns, Xorg 7...) and one for > > > >the _new releases_ of already used things (Kde, Gnome) > > > > > > > >I think the latter are already tested by they developpers > > > >when the first seems already in a very early stage. > > > > > > > >I'm disquieted by the "most annoying bugs" list and the _may > > > >be_ delayed Alpha 3. > > > > > > > >I personnally think that a stable distribution is better > > > > > > .than the very most up to date one. > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I was also very concerned when I saw the 'most annoying bugs' list > > > today (as I epxected Alpha 3). > > > > We have Alpha3. Bugs are expected ;) > > Perhaps replacing Alpha with Devel would convey the right message to > people, that these releases are development releases that are not > feature-complete or in feature-freeze. After feature-freeze they could be > called Alpha, Beta... > > It would avoid unnecessary discussion and panicking.. not everyone reads > the milestone plan like they ought to :-)
What is the difference between Alpha and Devel for you ? Alphas are no feature complete and not feature frozen in mind. -- Adrian Schroeter SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
