jdd wrote: > by kind of desktop: > > * kde > * gnome > * windowmaker > * xfce > * others (fvwm,...) > * no graphics at all
Some of that choice - KDE/Gnome/other - is today made even before you choose groups of software. I still think the grouping should be mostly about the role the system is intended for, but obviously the type of desktop is important. The other choices you have listed - windowmaker, xfce, fvwm, etc - are probably less often used, and whilst the grouping/software config must be flexible, we also have to draw a line. The grouping is after all a compromise between a completely default install without options, and the other extreme of having to select all packages yourself :-) /Per
