On Fri, 24 Nov 2006, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 24 Nov 2006, Hugo Costelha wrote: > > > It seems wuite intuitive to me. I also prefer longer names, if they are > > easier > > to remember and much easier to get some sense out of them, which I think is > > the case here. > > It does not take longer time to get a sense for a shorter word. > But directory listings have a chance to be readable and submitting URLs > has a chance not to get broken if the path names are short. > > the length of > > /pub/opensuse/distribution/openSUSE-10.2/repositories/source-non-oss/ > > already is really crazy and a pain for everyone who needs to spell or > type it - a full line already, and still missing protocol prefix, > hostname, arch suffix and filename. > > /pub/suse/i386/9.3/ was a good path naming and length.
+1 /pub/opensuse/10.2 would be enough. Of course 10.2 is a distribution and repeating the opensuse does not help understanding the structure. I also thing repositories is not needed at all. -- Andreas Vetter --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
